Mashup: Gmail and Twitter

I have to say that I still have mixed feelings about Twitter. On the one hand, I see it as a powerful tool harnessing the ideas of crowdsourcing. As a way to add email one-to-many and many-to-one functionality. On the other hand, I find it yet another fire hose of information coming at me at a time when I am not thoughtfully considering my other fire hoses. If it can become an asynchronous tool (not IM) to reach/leverage many people/thought leaders that is integrated into my personalized main knowledge tool of the time (Gmail), I am in! LINK

I see a few specific benefits of using Gmail as my Twitter client:

1) One tool for multiple modes of communication (email, IM, Tweets, voice-mail?, etc)
2) The ability to “thread” the tweets I follow (inherent to Gmail)
3) The ability to archive and search threaded tweets (some clients probably do this all ready???)

Can someone (Google? Other?) Make this happen, please.


BLC and Conference Format….An Open Letter to Alan

Hi Alan,

My name is Clint Kennedy and I am currently enjoying my last session of the last day of the 2008 BLC conference.  This is my first time attending the conference and I very much appreciate what you have done and are doing in the world of education and learning.

I do, however, have what I hope is some constructive criticism in regards to the conference and the way it is setup.  Twice during the conference I heard you mention that the real benefits of the conference come from the conversations attendees will be having by coming togther in this location for this week.  You and Ewan also mentioned that you believe the collective wisdom of the conference attendees is far superior to the  collective wisdom of the presenters.  Marc Prensky stated that “in 10 years the BLC conference will not be lecture based because people attending will not learn that way.”  Pedro Noguera stated that “teaching and talking is not the same.”  If we accept these statements as true, for arguments sake, why do we continue to sit in conference sessions as they are designed currently?  Who is to say that we are learning optimally with the lecture model?  Do we think that lecture is the way we as adults learn optimally?  Why do we continue to “sit and get” as opposed to having opportunities to be active learners?  The non-keynote sessions I have attended have ranged from very informative to very boring but most if not all were delivered using a teacher-centered model.   Can we change the format of the conference to be more attendee centric?  Could we  organize the conference around components of the unconference model?  

I would propose keeping the keynote speakers (they have been very thought provoking and they can and should provide theme and context), however, I would change all other sessions to unconference sessions.  Support teams would be needed to organize rooms, times, resources, etc.  Teams could organize and support the recording/capturing/tagging of the sessions.  And November Learning could certainly help educate the conference attendees as to what to expect from an unconference before they arrive.

I am writing this to you Alan because I think our community needs you to be the one that takes the learning conference to the next level and I think you are a leader that can make this happen.  I also think it would be great to be able to practice the pedagogy that we discussed so frequently during the last week.  Again, I want to thank you for a wonderful conference.  The people I met and exchanged ideas with were top notch.  I can only imagine the time and effort that goes into this production.  See you next year!

Thank you,

Clint Kennedy

Mystic, CT

Tools from BLC 08

I hate to do this becuase I am trying to focues on pedagogy, but I have to discuss briefly some of the wonderful tools I have discovered or re-discvovered:

Learning Event Generator – Davitt

Studio Code – Studiocode is an innovative technology that has revolutionized the way people all around the world look at video analysis and distribution. There is no longer a need to spend countless hours fast-forward and rewinding video tapes in order to pull out important bits of information.  Studiocode’s solid foundation lets you focus on the tasks at hand, whether it’s putting together a research paper, best practice video archive or student assessment task.”

Mind42 – Collaborative mind mapping in your browser…Isn’t 42 the answer to Life, the Universe, and Everything? Well, in this case it means FOR TWO and indicates the collaborative character of mind42. Manage all your ideas, whether alone, twosome or working together with the whole world – collaborative, browser-based and for free.

Learning Score – Imagine planning a learning event in the same creative way you make a movie by dragging icons representing different activities and groupings onto a timeline. Now you can with the Learning Score.

Evernote – Evernote allows you to easily capture information in any environment using whatever device or platform you find most convenient, and makes this information accessible and searchable at any time, from anywhere.

Jing – Evernote allows you to easily capture information in any environment using whatever device or platform you find most convenient, and makes this information accessible and searchable at any time, from anywhere.

Posted in BLC08. Tags: . Leave a Comment »

“Who is going to question the way we do business?”

Random Thoughts – Day 1

I am too tired and overwhelmed to bring this all together but I wanted to share some of the random ideas I was “saturated” with today and which I am currently “incubating” on:

The average K12 classroom in the USofA is indeed “boring”

There is no such thing a a “digital native”

Everyone in an organization plays a role in R&D…if they don’t they should be replaced/removed/fired

MySpace is the 3rd largest country in the world

Creativity: Saturation->Incubation->Illumination

Schools are based on convergence, the world is based on divergence

Johnny Lee is a divergent thinker

I want to create a parady of the old Apple “Think Different” ad for Ewan.  It would be called “Think Divergent[ly]”

Be a “retro-planner” not a “pre-planner”

Peer assessment online will lead to summative assessment genius (“2 stars and a wish”)

A Question for tomorrow?

What are the activities that can lead students to divergent ideas/thinking versus brainstorming/convergent ideas/thinking?

Interesting session (we got to actually participate instead of sitting and listening).  I like the possibilities of providing 21st Century skills thru dramatic experiences.  This company is based in London but has offices in NYC and LA.

Posted in BLC08. Tags: . Leave a Comment »

Keynote: Ewan McIntosh

TITLE: Not All Native Wit: From Creativity to Ingenuity

Great keynote, great thinker, not sure why I am not following him….I am now!

More relfection in the follow post!

Posted in BLC08. Tags: . Leave a Comment »

Thoughts on [R]evolution in Teacher Education session

From the program:

Carla Zembal-Saul, Ph.D., Associate Professor, Science Education 

When it comes to transforming education settings, colleges of education have traditionally been perceived as part of the problem rather than a central player in the revolution. This session 

will share the story of how one school-university partnership has contributed to the simultaneous renewal of veteran teachers, university faculty, school administrators, curriculum support 

teachers, and field supervisors – all in the service of enhancing children’s meaningful learning and educating the next generation of professional educators. Inquiry serves as both a core 

value and common practice within the community. Learning technologies that support inquiry into practice (e.g., video analysis software) are integrated throughout the partnership. In a 

reciprocal way, digital pedagogies are thoughtfully applied to children’s learning opportunities and assessed through teacher inquiry. 

See examples of how pre-service and beginning teachers are learning to engage their students in 21st century learning. Hear from veteran teachers and university faculty about how 

collaborating and systematically examining their practices have led to dramatic changes in school district and teacher education curriculum. Find out how school and university 

administrators are supporting the process and documenting unprecedented changes in their learning communities. Transformation is possible when we work together!

This session appeared to have potential but was somewhat disappointing.  The format was “stand and deliver” and the discussion was largely based around data that was not put in context  and hardly readable (very small font).

The examples of actual work at the Penn State College of Ed and its partnership with an EPDS (Elementary Prof. Dev. School) are very interesting.  I wanted to hear more about what makes this program unique and what the successes/failures have been.  An intro and discussion of this work plus a round-table discussion woul dhave been better.  First 25 minutes was practically useless.  I would recommend inetgrating the beigning data into the discussion of the EPDS to give it context.

Good take away thought: “tech integration” is not necessarily “21st century learning”….make this explicit with those you work with